Saturday, April 8, 2017

Madness # 6


Madness # 6
I am equally impressed with the number of versions of the fairy tale, Snow White, although not nearly as many versions exist as with Little Red Riding Hood. Continued reading and research of unfamiliar versions remain a high priority, especially in determining which versions would be suitable to use for varying ages of students in elementary, middle, and high schools.

In some ways, the tales of Snow White suggest a greater comparison and controversy between the main characters the evil stepmother and Snow White than with the main individuals in LRRH where the characters do not show nearly as much jealously.  In the Week 4 Discussion, a close look is taken at the fairy tale of Snow White and the assorted versions along with similar occurrences and endings.  After close reading in NCE, observations were made and included in Week Four Discussion which is included below.
 
 

Week Four Discussion
Walt Disney’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs so surpassed other versions of this tale that readers have a hard time remembering the versions preceding this one.  Through the different versions, writers have Snow White eat a poison apple, eat a bad cake, endure a toxic comb, among other adventures.  In other varying versions, the mean Queen orders a huntsman to bring her Snow White’s lungs and liver to cook and eat, or a container of blood with the addition of a toe, or her intestines wrapped in her blouse (NCE).
Disney single handedly changed everything when in his film he made a glass coffin, changing from the previous jeweled style coffins.  Although some components change, from version to version, the main story line continues with detailed elements of the plot. The similarities in all versions of SW seem to be “a reflection of a young woman’s development (74), a rite of passage in the young maiden’s life.
In order to understand the continued desire for reading, listening, and watching SW, the story line is forced to remain intriguing, as the author may allow the biological mom to die in childbirth and have the “evil” Queen persecute a seven-year-old stepdaughter (a typical fairy tale) for willing audiences.
This particular fairy tale highlights the realities, both good and bad, that actually occur in families, all the while explaining the trials of a little girl who simply does not deserve to be treated so harshly by anyone, especially not by her stepmother.  Regular struggles emerge, filled with jealously, contrasting an “evil “ stepmother with what would have been a “wonderful” biological mother.  Add in an absent father figure, and a female child longing for love and affection, and the audiences and readers of SW cannot wait to see what happens.
Some earlier versions of SW promote her as being in a coma and waking to find much evil surrounding her, including sexual rage and other repressions.  The evil Queen in one version is diagnosed as a “plotter, plot maker, a schemer, a witch, an artist...self absorbed as all artists traditionally are” (76).
Beauty becomes a simple passion.  In Sexton’s version of SW, Snow White becomes destined to be a Queen with Disney’s version creating a cultural icon, loved by all.  Who does not love watching a young beautiful maiden go against an evil, aging stepmother?  Disney clearly had a lasting idea in making SW, and even after a few pitfalls, eventually she gains her status as a believable, lasting iconic figure.
Continuing with thoughts from Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar’s essay about Snow White and Her Wicked Stepmother, readers learn about a legend of Adam’s first wife before Eve, carefully summarizing a female monster in a parable, which can be compared to Grimm’s similar tale of Snow White that also has a relationship between an angel-woman and monster-woman (271), raising issues for the true title of this work.
Although Disney seemed to prefer the title of Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs, questions are raised in the Gilbert and Gubar essay suggesting the preferred title as Snow White and Her Wicked Stepmother, since the tale does pit these two women together throughout the flow of this literary piece (291).  Many suggestions that the mirror actually becomes a weapon add an interesting twist pointing to the jealously between the two main women characters, with one willing to kill the other.  Continued use of words such as framed in a major looking glass (292), shows the obsession that a woman has on her looks and the jealousy that prevails because of personal appearance or worse, lack of beauty.  The absence of beauty for one creates a desire to destroy the other, with a willingness to plot and to  eliminate the opposition, turning the tale into a murder story, comparable to a television episode of NCII.
Upon learning that the Queen’s plot falls short of killing Snow White, other story lines continue ranging from suffocation to eating a poison apple skin.  As irony and bitterness reappear, the truth indicates and again suggests just how close the stepmother’s temptations are to Snow White’s inner desires (295).  The reference to both (Queen and Snow White) eating from the same apple seems to indicate the bitterness that one has for the other.
In the end, Snow White marries a Prince, and becomes Queen, herself, as Snow White seemingly goes full circle with this essay reminding readers of the thought that Snow White escaped one glass coffin only to be imprisoned again with a King whose voice dictatess Snow White’s daily activities.
All versions of Snow White seem to lead to similar lessons learned, fates encountered, deaths, and rebirths of sorts, along with assorted tests for the character to take and to endure.  Audiences of various versions of Snow White can still be reminded of the pettiness and jealousy that exists in society both then and now, particularly when pertaining to a spiteful female.  Readers and movie goers alike still seem to have a fascination with Snow White and her many tribulations, with a clear wish for Snow White to live forever in the hearts of her readers and viewers.


 
 
Bibliography
 
The Classic Fairy Tales.  Ed. Maria Tatar.  New York: Norton. 1999.  Print.
 
 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment